Faking it - the Viswanathan case

The Sunday Times, London (30 April 06) reports: "Indian-born (Kaavya) Viswanathan was just 17 when she secured a two-book deal for $500,000 (£275,000) on the strength of her first novel, How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life."

It all sounds like a happy ending to the long, hard years of struggle to become a writer. Not so. Two years on, Viswanathan’s books have been withdrawn from bookshops and her book tours cancelled. A Harvard graduate, she has been accused of plagiarising another student’s novel. Read the full report at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2769-2157647,00.html

In the Da Vinci case, Dan Brown was accused of plagiarising an idea and there is no law against that. The law protects an authors words and that is what Viswanathan is being accused of. By withdrawing Viswanathan’s books, her publisher has signalled that they believe the accusations to be true.

In the world of literature, creativity and originality are the commodities of value. That’s why plagiarism is seen as such a crime. A writer’s words are all that they have and a writer’s reputations rests on their words. To steal another writer’s words is to steal the results of their blood, sweat and tears. It will be very difficult for Viswanathan to recover her reputation from this.

In contrast, celebrity novels and books are often ghost-written but passed off as the celebrity’s own work. The ghost writer is rarely credited but walks away with a big cheque. Why is there no outcry about this? Perhaps there is an unspoken understanding that no-one expects a celebrity (especially if they are a footballer or popstar) to have the wherewithal to write their own book. Readers of such books don’t want originality and creativity but the story and the glamour of the celebrity aura so it doesn’t matter who writes it. Celeb books are like celeb perfume - no-one expects the star to have concocted the fragrance themselves. And similarly, the original writer - like the perfumiere - has been paid off for their silence.

So perhaps there’s a cynical lesson here for potential plagiarists out there. Make sure you pay off the writer whose work you take the credit for.

And get them to sign a confidentiality agreement.

For more on plagiarism, you might also like to read The Guardian’s article on plagiarism, with links to related plagiarism issues eg plagiarism at universities - see http://books.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1767928,00.html

2 Responses to “Faking it - the Viswanathan case”

  1. AndrewE Says:

    Yang-May,

    I came across your blog through Benjamin Yeoh’s blog. I’m a London-based playwright who grew up in France and Japan. Please see my response to your comment on Ben’s blog.

    Plagerism vs inspiration seems to be a thin line in my view, especially when it is woven so finely into a text like Dan Brown has done. As you point out here it only really becomes an issue when large sums of money are involved. Had Brown’s book not been a million-dollar best seller one wonders whether the case for plagerism would have happened at all.

    Beyond money and fame, plagerism in art is arguably a part of the creation process, by which I mean we inevitably draw on influences, ideas of others who, in turn, drew on the thoughts of their predecessors and so on and so forth until the first major literary works were established and even further into mythology/folklore.

    Who can really claim intellectual property when intellect is an organic state of consciousness rooted in the here and now?

    Ezra Pound famously said “We have ceased, I think, to believe that a nation’s literatre is anyone’s personal property”, clearly with the Da Vinci Code this is not the case. But does claiming literature as personal property help in any way?

    This is a multi-faceted debate with as much ‘truth’ from an any angle you approach it.

    The only solution that I can fathom is to write and be aware that the words on the page may well have been expressed elsewhere at different times but as human beings we can only experience the here and now, so plagerism is in a sense inevitable…but delectable inevitability!

  2. memigo Says:

    Auto-trackback from memigo.com

    Guardian article was added to memigo. Thanks!
    Follow trackback to find related articles…

Leave a Reply